Skip to main content
Aviatize — Flight School Management Software
Piper Aircraft PA-32R Saratoga / Lance

Piper Aircraft

PA-32R Saratoga / Lance

Single-engine piston · Complex trainer · 1980s–1990s

discontinued

Photo: FlugKerl2 via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

Power
300 hp
Cruise
167 kt
MTOW
3,600 lb
Range
810 nm
Fuel
100LL avgas

🇺🇸Specs shown in Imperial.

Performance

  • Cruise speed (Vc)167 kt
  • Never-exceed speed (Vne)195 kt
  • Stall (landing config) (Vs0)60 kt
  • Climb rate1,010 fpm
  • Service ceiling16,700 ft
  • Range810 nm
  • Endurance6 h
  • Takeoff roll1,183 ft
  • Landing roll1,612 ft

Weights

  • MTOW3,600 lb
  • Empty weight2,178 lb
  • Useful load1,422 lb
  • Baggage capacity200 lb

Dimensions

  • Wingspan36.2 ft
  • Length27.7 ft
  • Height8.1 ft
  • Cabin width49 in

Powerplant

  • EngineLycoming IO-540-K1G5300 hp · 100LL · 16 gph
  • Total horsepower300 hp
  • Primary fuel100LL avgas
  • Unleaded pathLeaded only — needs G100UL or engine swap

Cockpit & avionics

  • Cockpit typeanalog
  • Autopilot commonly availableYes
  • Typical packages
    • Six-pack analog with Bendix/King KX-155 and KFC-200 autopilot1976–1990s factory standard
    • Avidyne Entegra (Saratoga II HP / TC)2000s factory
    • Garmin GTN 750 / G500 TXi retrofitmodern retrofit on legacy airframes
  • Training note

    Most PA-32R airframes flying today carry a mix of original analog primary instruments and modern Garmin or Avidyne retrofits. Schools using the type for the FAR 61.31 complex and high-performance endorsements typically operate one airframe rather than a fleet, and benefit from a modern panel for the IFR portion of the training profile.

Certification

  • RegulatoryFAR Part 23 · EASA CS-23
  • Certified rolesNormal category — IFR / day / night
  • IFRYes
  • Spin approvedNo
  • Aerobatic-categoryNo
  • TailwheelNo
  • Complex (FAR 61.31)Yes
  • High-performance (FAR 61.31)Yes

Why is the PA-32R Saratoga / Lance popular?

Structured popularity-driver evidence. Each axis below carries one factual statement; we don't grade, the facts speak.

Production volume

The PA-32R retractable family — Cherokee Lance, Saratoga SP, Turbo Saratoga, and Saratoga II HP / TC — accounts for roughly 3,500 of the broader PA-32 Cherokee Six family's total production. The fixed-gear PA-32 Cherokee Six / PA-32-260 / PA-32-300 / Saratoga adds several thousand more airframes to the broader PA-32 fleet.

Regulatory fit

Retractable tricycle gear, constant-speed propeller, and 300 hp Lycoming IO-540 / TIO-540 place every PA-32R variant inside the FAR 61.31 complex and high-performance categories. One airframe carries both endorsements alongside the IFR / commercial training profile.

Industry network effects

Piper Owner Society and the broader Cherokee community support the PA-32R family alongside the PA-28 Cherokee, PA-28R Arrow, and Cherokee Six. CFI familiarity with Cherokee-family handling is broad across US Part 141 and Part 61 schools.

Operating economics

Lycoming IO-540 / TIO-540 at 300 hp burns roughly 14 to 18 gph in cruise. Six-seat cabin and 167 to 178 kt cruise place the type in personal-touring and complex / high-performance training rather than ab-initio.

Fuel future-proofing

Lycoming IO-540 and TIO-540 engines are part of the Lycoming family being progressively cleared for G100UL under the FAA EAGLE programme. Operators should track variant-specific G100UL STC eligibility for fleet-modernisation planning.

Before you buy more aircraft

The next airframe is rarely the highest-leverage move.

Flight school revenue is a function of three things — utilisation, dispatch reliability, and student progression — that multiply rather than add. Most schools running below 850 hours per aircraft per year have hidden capacity worth more than the next purchase, already paid for and sitting on the ramp.

Read: Why buying more aircraft probably won't grow your school

How flight schools track this aircraft in Aviatize

Schools or owner-pilots configure the PA-32R in Aviatize as a single airframe with the Lycoming IO-540 / TIO-540 engine modelled as a child component for TBO tracking and a constant-speed-propeller component for overhaul cycles. The retractable-gear maintenance schedule (cycles vs. hours) should be tracked separately. Pilot-currency rules should gate the resource on a current FAR 61.31 complex and high-performance endorsement.

schedulingaircraft maintenancetraining management

Editorial confidence

Medium confidenceLast reviewed 2026-05-26

Variant timeline, engine family, and certification path attributed to FAA TCDS A20SO and the Piper Owner Society. Specific production sub-totals vary across sources because of the family's many variants; the ~3,500 figure covers the retractable PA-32R airframes built between 1976 and 2009.

Sources

Primary sources are POH / TCDS / manufacturer pages; derived sources record where Aviatize editorial synthesis is layered on top.

  • Primary sourceFAA TCDS·Retrieved 2026-05-14

    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    https://drs.faa.gov/browse/TCDS

    FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet A20SO covers the PA-32R Cherokee Lance, Saratoga, and derivatives.

  • Primary sourceType Club·Retrieved 2026-05-14

    Piper Owner Society

    https://piperowner.org/

    Piper Owner Society — Saratoga / Lance coverage including ownership and operating context.

  • Secondary sourceAviatize-internal·Retrieved 2026-05-26

    Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piper_PA-32

    Wikipedia article verified on 2026-05-26. The article covers the broader PA-32 family (fixed-gear Cherokee Six + retractable PA-32R Lance/Saratoga). Confirmed: full PA-32 family ~7,842+ built across all variants 1965-2007 (this entry's 3,500 figure is specifically the PA-32R retract subset); first flight December 6, 1963; first production PA-32-260 Cherokee Six 260 hp; PA-32-300 Cherokee Six 300 hp Lycoming IO-540-K1A5; baseline (fixed-gear Six) cruise 146 kn, max speed 151 kn, range 730 nm, gross 3,400 lb, empty 1,788 lb (this entry's higher values are for the retract PA-32R Saratoga SP variant).

  • Editorial synthesisAviatize-internal·Retrieved 2026-05-14

    Aviatize editorial

    Entry authored by Aviatize from accumulated industry knowledge cross-referenced against the primary sources cited above. Operator lists are intentionally empty rather than speculative.