Skip to main content
Aviatize — Flight School Management Software
Flight Design General Aviation CT family (CTSW / CTLS / CTLSi / F2)

Flight Design General Aviation

CT family (CTSW / CTLS / CTLSi / F2)

Light sport aircraft (LSA) · LSA trainer · 2000s glass era

Photo: KGG1951 via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

Power
100 hp
Cruise
120 kt
MTOW
1,320 lb
Range
850 nm
Fuel
Unleaded mogas (EN228 / autofuel)

🇺🇸Specs shown in Imperial.

Performance

  • Cruise speed (Vc)120 kt
  • Never-exceed speed (Vne)145 kt
  • Stall (landing config) (Vs0)39 kt
  • Climb rate960 fpm
  • Service ceiling15,000 ft
  • Range850 nm
  • Endurance7 h
  • Takeoff roll480 ft
  • Landing roll480 ft

Weights

  • MTOW1,320 lb
  • Empty weight805 lb
  • Useful load515 lb
  • Baggage capacity110 lb

Dimensions

  • Wingspan28.1 ft
  • Length21 ft
  • Height7.7 ft
  • Cabin width49 in

Powerplant

  • EngineRotax 912 ULS100 hp · Mogas · 4.5 gph
  • Total horsepower100 hp
  • Primary fuelUnleaded mogas (EN228 / autofuel)
  • Unleaded pathMogas-capable (Rotax 912 / equivalent)

Cockpit & avionics

  • Cockpit typeglass
  • Autopilot commonly availableYes
  • Typical packages
    • Dynon SkyView or Garmin G3X Touch (CTLSi and later)2012 onwards
    • Garmin G1000 NXi-equivalent (F2 successor)2020 onwards
    • Dynon D-100 / D-180 (early CTSW / CTLS)2005–2010
  • Training note

    Flight Design CTSW / CTLS / CTLSi airframes shipped with a wide range of avionics fits depending on year, with Dynon and Garmin glass cockpits common from 2012 onwards. The successor F2 carries a modern integrated Garmin panel; schools transitioning from a CTLS fleet to the F2 should plan an avionics-syllabus refresh for student instructors.

Certification

  • RegulatoryASTM F2245 consensus standards · FAA S-LSA · EASA CS-VLA / national microlight categories
  • Certified rolesSpecial Light Sport Aircraft (S-LSA, US) · European microlight / Very Light Aircraft (national category dependent) · Day VFR; IFR within S-LSA limitations
  • IFRNo
  • Spin approvedNo
  • Aerobatic-categoryNo
  • TailwheelNo
  • Complex (FAR 61.31)No
  • High-performance (FAR 61.31)No

Why is the CT family (CTSW / CTLS / CTLSi / F2) popular?

Structured popularity-driver evidence. Each axis below carries one factual statement; we don't grade, the facts speak.

Production volume

Flight Design built more than 1,900 CT-family airframes across the CT2K, CTSW, CTLS, and CTLSi production runs between 1997 and 2016. The CT series was the US LSA bestseller for several years; approximately 344 CTSW / CTLS airframes were US-registered by 2012.

Fuel future-proofing

Rotax 912 ULS and 912 iS Sport are mogas-capable (EN228 unleaded) and 100LL-capable. The CT fleet sits outside the FAA EAGLE / California UNL94 leaded-fuel transition exposure that constrains the legacy 100LL training fleet.

Operating economics

Carbon-composite construction, Rotax 912 ULS / 912 iS Sport at roughly 4 to 5 gph mogas, and 120 kt cruise produce a touring-LSA cost profile that supported the type's commercial success during the first decade of the US LSA rule.

Regulatory fit

Dual-certified as US S-LSA under ASTM F2245 and operated across European microlight / VLA / national rules. With the F2 successor model now the focus of new-build production, schools considering the CTLS or CTLSi are evaluating a used-market airframe with current factory support but no new-build availability.

Before you buy more aircraft

The next airframe is rarely the highest-leverage move.

Flight school revenue is a function of three things — utilisation, dispatch reliability, and student progression — that multiply rather than add. Most schools running below 850 hours per aircraft per year have hidden capacity worth more than the next purchase, already paid for and sitting on the ramp.

Read: Why buying more aircraft probably won't grow your school

How flight schools track this aircraft in Aviatize

Schools operating CTSW / CTLS / CTLSi airframes typically configure each one in Aviatize as a single LSA resource with the Rotax 912 ULS or 912 iS Sport as a child component for TBO and overhaul-reserve tracking against the Rotax maintenance schedule. Composite-airframe inspection cycles are a separate planning concern from the engine schedule and should be tracked accordingly. Pilot-currency rules should gate the resource on a current sport-pilot certificate (US) or national microlight rating (European environments).

schedulingaircraft maintenancetraining managementbilling

Editorial confidence

Medium confidenceLast reviewed 2026-05-26

Variant timeline, regulatory positioning, and current corporate ownership attributed to Flight Design's US and German manufacturer pages and aggregated Wikipedia source. Specific production sub-totals and US-registration figures vary across sources; treat numbers as approximate.

Sources

Primary sources are POH / TCDS / manufacturer pages; derived sources record where Aviatize editorial synthesis is layered on top.

  • Primary sourceManufacturer brief·Retrieved 2026-05-26

    Flight Design USA

    https://flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/

    Flight Design USA aircraft hub. Verified on 2026-05-26 that the current actively-marketed line includes F2 Certified, F2 LSA, CT-Super (Super Injection), CTLS (Rotax 912 ULS), and CTLSi GT 2020 (Rotax 912 iS at $189,000 list with two-axis autopilot, BRS parachute, dual Dynon SkyView HDX or Garmin G3X glass, 35 gal fuel, NextGen ADS-B-out compliance). Flight Design USA reports approximately 85 CTLSi airframes delivered since 2012 — much lower than the mid-2000s US LSA peak.

  • Primary sourceManufacturer brief·Retrieved 2026-05-14

    Flight Design General Aviation

    https://flightdesign.com/

    Current Flight Design factory entity covering the F2 successor and legacy CT support.

  • Secondary sourceAviatize-internal·Retrieved 2026-05-14

    Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_Design_CT

    Wikipedia article aggregating the CT family development history, variant timeline, and US LSA market context.

  • Editorial synthesisAviatize-internal·Retrieved 2026-05-14

    Aviatize editorial

    Entry authored by Aviatize from accumulated industry knowledge cross-referenced against the primary sources cited above. Operator lists are intentionally empty rather than speculative.